AI-Powered Retros
Skip the silence. Get to the good part.
With suggested topics, structured summaries, and a running record of previous feedback, Windy turns retros from a time sink into a real engine for growth.
Windy Collects Feedback Before You Even Join
Hey @Alex! Time for our sprint retro. First - what went well this sprint? Any thoughts on the new PR review process?
The new PR review process really sped things up! Also the daily standups were more focused after we switched to async updates
Great! What didn't go so well?
We had 3 production incidents from rushing features at the end. Also the design handoffs were late which blocked frontend work
Thanks for that context. Any specific improvements you'd suggest?
We need better testing requirements before marking stories as done. And maybe a mid-sprint design check-in?
Got it! I'll include these in the retro summary along with feedback from the rest of the team. You'll get the full report before tomorrow's meeting.
So you can focus on fixing what matters.
Sprint 24 Retro
This report was automatically generated by Windy after talking to 8 team members.
🎯 Top Themes for Discussion
1. CI/CD Pipeline Improvements Working Well (6 mentions)
The new automated testing in PR checks caught 12 potential bugs before merge. Team velocity increased 15% with faster deployment cycles.
The parallel test runs cut our CI time from 45 to 12 minutes. Game changer. - Backend Team
Suggested Discussion: How can we apply similar optimizations to our staging environment?
2. Design Handoff Delays (5 mentions)
3 frontend stories blocked waiting for final designs. Average wait time: 2.5 days.
We built to the specs, then had to rebuild when designs changed mid-sprint. - Frontend Team
Suggested Discussion: Should we implement a design freeze 2 days before sprint start?
3. On-Call Burden Uneven (4 mentions)
Two engineers handled 75% of incidents due to service ownership concentration.
I was paged 6 times this sprint, all for the auth service. We need backup expertise. - Sarah
Suggested Discussion: Cross-training plan for critical services?
📊 Action Items from Last Retro
✅ Completed: Implement PR template with testing checklist
⏳ In Progress: Documentation for new microservices (60% complete)
❌ Blocked: Quarterly architecture review (waiting on CTO availability)
💡 Quick Wins Identified
- Add Datadog monitors for the checkout service (2 hrs effort)
- Create shared Postman collection for API testing
- Schedule weekly 15-min design sync to prevent handoff issues
📝 Parking Lot (Save for Later)
- Migrate from Jenkins to GitHub Actions (needs technical spike)
- Implement feature flags for gradual rollouts
- Revisit our definition of “done” to include performance testing
Forget What Happened? Windy Didn't.
and previous retros and conversations. No more staring at a blank page trying to remember what went well or what could've gone better. Hey @Jose! It's retro time - to start, what went well these last 2 months?
Hmm - I'm struggling to remember what we even did...jog my memory a bit
Of course - last retro you all talked about implementing a new standup and a new meeting cadence - what do you think?
Oh yeah - we did that! It was a bit of a pain at first but it really helped us stay on track and get things done
You also mentioned 7 times these last few weeks about how your local dev environment was broken - any updates on that?
Yup still a disaster - can you flag that as a blocker?
Got it - anything else top of mind?
Why traditional retros fail
